(Best viewed in Internet Explorer)
Reviewing "E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction"
Upon suggestion, I have decided to read E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction by David Foster Wallace. Here is my review of the essay along with my personal reflections as it relates to me.
The essay starts by calling us voyeurs. This is an acceptable premise, given his citation of the statistic that American watch on average six hours of television a day. He goes on to say that fiction writers are particularly good at voyeurism and that the root of this is our self-consciousness and the affliction so many of us face about being being around others. TV is a gateway to observation that helps us find our voice.
Of course, fighting our loneliness and finding our voice through voyeurism is a effort in delving into illusion. He provides the example that people are asked to "act natural" while on camera, but acting natural while on camera for most people doesn't look natural at all. It is an illusion of looking natural.
He goes on to examine how television is viewed in a strange light of criticism. People love to hate television. He says we have a weird "hate-need-fear-6 hrs.-daily gestalt" about it. He goes from this point to talk about syndication and the self-referential tendency of television. The subject of television has become itself. This is no new idea, Umberto Eco famously wrote that "The media is the message."
He goes on to discuss "metafiction" - or a sort of inverse of realism. Whereas realism is a practice of showing what it sees, metafiction is the practice of telling it as it sees itself telling it as it sees it. Jean Baudrilland's "Simulation and Simulacra" discusses this a little - reality has slipped away to simulacra, copies without an original. This discussion of metafiction discusses how fiction fictionalizes itself, which sounds impossible until you understand the self-referential void these narratives emerge from.
Irony is the domain of postmodernism because meaning is lost in the procession of simulacra. Television is the best media for irony because what you see conflicts with what you hear so often. Images of dead bodies juxtaposed with the words of someone saying "there is no oppression" or people caught saying things that don't match reality - "Newt Gingrich said Obama said this, but you can see Obama actually said this." Irony is dangerous for television because it undermines its authority, but it gains validity by highlighting these ironies.
Wallace goes on to describe how we become more addicted to television, and how television creates a system that enforces this. This is more than self-evident to me, as we all know that advertising agencies and network executives pay big money to find ways to manipulate us - and we know it works.
This addiction to television has lead to a change in literature, because television is a major shared experience that we apparently spend more waking time doing than anything else. He writes about how pop references in literature work because we know these references, and because we are uncomfortable that we know these references.
It goes on to discuss how pop references have become a necessary part of contemporary literature. Whereas bloviated old college professors would make weird claims that literature is "timeless", Mr. Wallace notes that television and the postmodern condition requires a new sensitivity toward contemporary references due to the universal experiences we have in the system of understanding that has been created from television.
Finishing the first half of the essay, he examines an excerpt from White Noise by Don DeLillo(which I totally need to read now). The scene involves two guys following signs to the "World's Most Photographed Barn" and upon arriving one character realizes that this mutually enforced reality is a complete farce. "No one sees the barn" as everyone takes pictures of it. The scene around the barn loses the barn. As the character complains, the other character responds with silence.
The second half of the essay finally posits the thesis: irony, stone-faced silence, and fear of ridicule are key features of contemporary U.S. culture. In this vein, he sees a push to transfigure the power television has over the vast American landscape and the dominating presence is so extreme the it may be beyond transfiguration.
He provides examples of commercials and television shows and contemporary literature that address these themes, but already these examples are outdated compared to the intensity of newer material that is saturating our world. For example, he provides the example of the Pepsi commercial showing a Pepsi sound van manipulating people to come off the beach and eagerly get refreshed - "Pepsi: The Choice of a New Generation". The ironies throughout this ad about choice, and being an individual that stands out from the crowd but fits into the crowd, and so forth are still present in current ads, and newer ads are better about this. Consider the Axe ads with the sea of women forcefully telling younger men what they want and jumping all over them when they spray themselves. Consider the old Sprite ads with Grant Hill ironically selling a product whilst dollar signs are flashing on the screen with each comment he makes. The PBS Frontline documentary "The Merchants of Cool" addresses these themes to some degree, but also the new research methods that take these problems to a new level.
The essay starts by calling us voyeurs. This is an acceptable premise, given his citation of the statistic that American watch on average six hours of television a day. He goes on to say that fiction writers are particularly good at voyeurism and that the root of this is our self-consciousness and the affliction so many of us face about being being around others. TV is a gateway to observation that helps us find our voice.
Of course, fighting our loneliness and finding our voice through voyeurism is a effort in delving into illusion. He provides the example that people are asked to "act natural" while on camera, but acting natural while on camera for most people doesn't look natural at all. It is an illusion of looking natural.
He goes on to examine how television is viewed in a strange light of criticism. People love to hate television. He says we have a weird "hate-need-fear-6 hrs.-daily gestalt" about it. He goes from this point to talk about syndication and the self-referential tendency of television. The subject of television has become itself. This is no new idea, Umberto Eco famously wrote that "The media is the message."
He goes on to discuss "metafiction" - or a sort of inverse of realism. Whereas realism is a practice of showing what it sees, metafiction is the practice of telling it as it sees itself telling it as it sees it. Jean Baudrilland's "Simulation and Simulacra" discusses this a little - reality has slipped away to simulacra, copies without an original. This discussion of metafiction discusses how fiction fictionalizes itself, which sounds impossible until you understand the self-referential void these narratives emerge from.
Irony is the domain of postmodernism because meaning is lost in the procession of simulacra. Television is the best media for irony because what you see conflicts with what you hear so often. Images of dead bodies juxtaposed with the words of someone saying "there is no oppression" or people caught saying things that don't match reality - "Newt Gingrich said Obama said this, but you can see Obama actually said this." Irony is dangerous for television because it undermines its authority, but it gains validity by highlighting these ironies.
Wallace goes on to describe how we become more addicted to television, and how television creates a system that enforces this. This is more than self-evident to me, as we all know that advertising agencies and network executives pay big money to find ways to manipulate us - and we know it works.
This addiction to television has lead to a change in literature, because television is a major shared experience that we apparently spend more waking time doing than anything else. He writes about how pop references in literature work because we know these references, and because we are uncomfortable that we know these references.
It goes on to discuss how pop references have become a necessary part of contemporary literature. Whereas bloviated old college professors would make weird claims that literature is "timeless", Mr. Wallace notes that television and the postmodern condition requires a new sensitivity toward contemporary references due to the universal experiences we have in the system of understanding that has been created from television.
Finishing the first half of the essay, he examines an excerpt from White Noise by Don DeLillo(which I totally need to read now). The scene involves two guys following signs to the "World's Most Photographed Barn" and upon arriving one character realizes that this mutually enforced reality is a complete farce. "No one sees the barn" as everyone takes pictures of it. The scene around the barn loses the barn. As the character complains, the other character responds with silence.
The second half of the essay finally posits the thesis: irony, stone-faced silence, and fear of ridicule are key features of contemporary U.S. culture. In this vein, he sees a push to transfigure the power television has over the vast American landscape and the dominating presence is so extreme the it may be beyond transfiguration.
He provides examples of commercials and television shows and contemporary literature that address these themes, but already these examples are outdated compared to the intensity of newer material that is saturating our world. For example, he provides the example of the Pepsi commercial showing a Pepsi sound van manipulating people to come off the beach and eagerly get refreshed - "Pepsi: The Choice of a New Generation". The ironies throughout this ad about choice, and being an individual that stands out from the crowd but fits into the crowd, and so forth are still present in current ads, and newer ads are better about this. Consider the Axe ads with the sea of women forcefully telling younger men what they want and jumping all over them when they spray themselves. Consider the old Sprite ads with Grant Hill ironically selling a product whilst dollar signs are flashing on the screen with each comment he makes. The PBS Frontline documentary "The Merchants of Cool" addresses these themes to some degree, but also the new research methods that take these problems to a new level.
2 Comments:
I'm happy that you made the jump to the effect of the internet on us now.
I watched a commercial the other day about hulu, and found this to be an interesting interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4J_yGuh3Jw
David Foster Wallace killed himself a few years ago, and I really wonder how he would have felt about the most recent additions to the internet, like youtube, and the effect that it's having on normal people.
I've been watching youtube more, becoming more familiarized with the youtube bloggers and the memes. What's really funny is how youtube has added the "partners" option now, where people can share in their ad revenue. I think it was Lonelygirl15 who was portrayed to be a girl doing vlogs about her life, but was really a scripted actress.
Will, you've written some incredible stuff lately. I've enjoyed reading your posts the last few weeks. Thank you.
Peace,
A
Post a Comment
<< Home